Tag Archives: politics

What’s Wrong With The American Presidency (and how to fix it)

The American presidency, has gone awry in so many ways over the last several years. I’d also like to add that the American Senate and House of  Representatives has gone bad too. No one in good conscience and of sound mind can dispute my last two sentences.  There is not a question mark after the title because I’m not asking how to fix it. I’m going to tell you what should be done. I will warn you though, you may not like what I have to say.

Most law enforcement agencies use psychological testing to measure a variety of job-related behaviors and personality traits to help them pick the best applicants for a job as police officers. The branches of the military in the United States use aptitude, achievement, and personality (psychological) tests to screen candidates.

Our country carefully screens and selects the people who try to protect our lives. Why don’t we do that with elected officials who have the power to effect so many issues in our lives? I believe that those tests should be applied to everyone who is running for candidacy for any elected government position. We need people who are of sound mind and have our best interests in mind.

Hey, how about a background check too? How did this clown get into Congress? Hey everyone on Long Island, that one is on you.

I believe that anyone running for an elected position should have to pass a background check. I also believe that public officials family members should pass a background check. If there’s a criminal history with more than a speeding ticket then that person could be an influential liability to the elected official.

Take a look at that graph from Boston University. Look at the purple and green lines. Those represent inductive reasoning and perceptual speed. They drop precipitously after the age of 60, for everyone. Those losses in cognitive function are coming for you and me as well as all of our government representatives. I don’t know about you, but I want the people making decisions on my behalf to be smarter than me. In the United States they have a minimum age of 35 to be elected President. If there’s a minimum, there should also be a maximum.

To summarize:

-I believe ALL elected officials should have to pass cognitive and psychological testing.

-I believe ALL elected officials should have to pass a background check. If they have anything more than a speeding ticket, they’re out.

-I also believe that there should be a maximum age for ALL elected federal government officials.

I do not believe that either presidential candidate, and many congress and senate members do not meet what I think are reasonable expectations for our elected government officials.

To be fair, I do want to say that many, many people far older than me are sharper than a lot of people younger than them and could do any government job as well as anyone. But I also believe that we should be cautious and safe with whom we trust to lead our nation.

I’m Phil and I approve this message. If you are voting in the primaries this year consider writing me in, if I pass the tests. #Phil2024 

So what do you think of my ideas? Do you have any ideas to improve the sad state of our government?

Thanks for reading! Phil

TBT! When I’m Elected President, or Sexiest Man Alive

With the Presidential election just 5 weeks away, I thought it was time to start my campaigning. Here’s a classic Phil Factor from October of 2012:

president-phil

When I am elected President, or Sexiest Man Alive, the political season is going to change by virtue of the newly enacted Phil Laws. What are the Phil Laws you ask? The Phil Laws are a set of laws that I will unilaterally impose without interference from Congress, the Senate or anyone. That’s the first law. These laws will impose common sense upon a broken world by addressing virtually any issue I see fit to correct from doing away with paper check writing to eliminating daylight savings time to having every public bathroom stall the size of the handicapped stalls.I could write pages on the Phil Laws, but today I’m going to address the political campaign season.

1. No more political ads on television: They’re not entertaining. They’re not factual, and it’s not even possible that every candidate is a former serial killer litterbug. No more t.v. commercials. Just get some bumper stickers and set up a website and if we’re interested we’ll go look at it.

download-12

2. No more prime time debates: We’re already angry enough at the politicians. Why do they feel the need to further enrage us by disrupting the new episodes of our favorite shows just when the fall season is getting underway. When the Phil Laws take effect all political debates will occur during the evening news. It’s what the evening news is going to talk about the day off and day after anyway.

3. No more political parties. One, don’t call them parties. These two groups are not even remotely fun. Two, virtually every politician has flipped flopped back and forth between parties in their career so who knows what their beliefs are anyway. No more party affiliations. Tell us what you plan to do when you’re elected and if we like your ideas better than the other candidate we’ll vote for you.

ca5f5d17e2cc515cb6aa78ee195b9de9

4. The Presidential Age Limit: Currently the law requires that you be 35 years of age to become President. Why? Do we suddenly become smarter at 35 than we were at 30 or 25? You know what? If I’m in college and I can’t get the job I want until I’m 35 years old then I’m going to pick another major. That’s why the geniuses behind Angry Birds and Facebook are doing what they do. Are you telling me those silicon valley software tycoons who are millionaires by the time they’re 28 aren’t smart? Those are the people I want solving the worlds problems for me. The Phil Laws will lower the Presidential age limit to 25 and put a cap on the upper age a President can be. It’s a medical fact that our cognition, memory, and reaction time all start decreasing as we age. Why are we electing the people who are more likely to have a decline in their functioning in office? I say top it at 60 years and give them a nice pension. To those that would cry age discrimination I would say that the Presidency is too important to risk on someone who is losing brain cells at an alarming rate AND isn’t it already age discrimination to say someone under 35 can’t do the job?

Thank you very much. You’ve been a wonderful audience. Drive safely. Have a great Thursday! ~Phil

#PHIL2020